SOC 1 vs. SOC 2: Key Differences and Which to Choose

When clients expect assurance around data handling or financial processes, SOC reports often become part of the conversation. But knowing which one applies to your business can be tricky. The difference between SOC 1 and SOC 2 lies in what each report is designed to evaluate—and choosing the right one depends on the kind of services you offer.

Many organizations explore these reports to meet customer demands or stay competitive. If you're navigating compliance for the first time, clarity is key. In this blog, we’ll explain what SOC 1 and SOC 2 are, their main differences, and which one makes the most sense for your business.

» Let the experts handle your SOC 2 compliance with our startup and enterprise services

What Are SOC 1 and SOC 2 Reports?

SOC 1 reports focus on internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). It’s designed to show how well your organization manages financial data and ensures accuracy and reliability in financial processes.

SOC 2 reports evaluate controls based on the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA’s) Trust Services Criteria, which include security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. It focuses on how your organization protects systems and data, emphasizing operational and compliance-related controls.

» Learn more: What is good compliance and how to get started?

Both SOC 1 and SOC 2 Offer Type I and Type II Evaluations

• Type I reports assess the design and implementation of controls at a single point in time, resulting in a shorter audit process with limited testing. This makes them useful for organizations seeking a snapshot of their control environment at a specific moment, but they do not evaluate the ongoing effectiveness of those controls over time.
• Type II reports evaluate both the design and the operating effectiveness of controls over a defined period—typically 3 to 6 months—requiring more extensive testing and supporting documentation. Type II reports provide greater assurance to stakeholders due to their in-depth analysis of how controls function over time.

» Learn more: How SOC 2 Type 2 can strengthen your security posture

Professional SOC 2 Services

GRSee simplifies the process so you can meet SOC 2 requirements confidently, without getting lost in technical complexity.

Learn More

Benefits of Different SOC Reports

Each type of SOC audit offers unique benefits. The selection of the appropriate SOC audit will depend on the services and products your organization provides.

SOC 1 Report Benefits

• Builds client trust: Helps you secure partnerships with clients who require SOC 1 certification from their vendors to ensure financial integrity.
• Demonstrates financial accuracy: Provides evidence of your commitment to accurate financial data and the reliability of your services, reassuring clients about the quality of your work.
• Mitigates financial risks: Reduces the risk of presenting inaccurate or unreliable financial data, which could lead to costly errors or consequences.

SOC 2 Report Benefits

• Improves data security: Shows your commitment to strong data protection practices, assuring clients that their information is well-protected.
• Reduces risk of data breaches: Lowers the likelihood of experiencing a data breach and the associated financial and reputational damage.
• Strengthens customer trust: Reinforces trust by demonstrating that you consistently follow information security best practices to safeguard your clients' data.

» Read more about the merits of adopting SOC 2

Audit Procedures and Documentation Requirements

SOC 1

These audit procedures primarily evaluate processes related to financial reporting, ensuring the segregation of duties and the overall effectiveness of financial controls.

Documentation includes:

1. Established policies: Written policies that define the financial reporting processes and controls in place.
2. Detailed procedures: Specific procedures outlining how financial transactions are processed, monitored, and controlled.
3. Evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of these controls: Documentation such as audit trails, transaction logs, or system access records that confirm the effectiveness of controls in practice.

SOC 2

SOC 2 documentation is more comprehensive due to the broader range of criteria it covers, including security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Documentation includes:

1. Policies and procedures: Written guidelines that explain the organization’s approach to securing systems, maintaining availability, ensuring processing integrity, protecting confidentiality, and safeguarding privacy.
2. Risk assessments: Detailed evaluations of the risks associated with the five Trust Services Criteria and how they are mitigated by existing controls. This helps to demonstrate that risks are being actively managed.
3. Control tests: Evidence from periodic testing of controls to verify they are working as intended. This can include results from penetration tests, security audits, and system reviews to assess the robustness of controls.
4. Compliance evidence: Documentation showing that the organization adheres to the Trust Services Criteria. This could include records of how security measures were implemented, how data is protected, and how compliance is maintained across various processes.

» Understand how SOC 2 Type 1 compliance secures partnerships and investments

SOC 2 Compliance Made Simple

Achieve SOC 2 compliance with GRSee's internal auditing.

Ensure continuous security control monitoring for consistent compliance.

Regularly update documentation to match organizational changes

Obtain SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 certification with expert guidance.

Learn More

How to Decide Between SOC 1 and SOC 2 Reports

SOC 1

SOC 1 is most appropriate when a service organization’s operations have a direct impact on a client’s financial reporting. Examples include:

• Payroll processing firms: These organizations ensure accurate payroll entries in clients' financial records. From payroll calculations to tax withholdings and timely disbursements, every step must comply with regulatory requirements. A SOC 1 report confirms that these internal controls are in place, ensuring that auditors can rely on the data for accurate financial reporting.
• Loan servicing companies: Loan servicing companies manage data that directly impacts clients' accounting processes. By overseeing loan payments, interest calculations, and reporting, these firms affect clients’ financial records significantly. A SOC 1 report guarantees that its internal controls are adequately designed to maintain the accuracy and integrity of this data.
• Financial institutions outsourcing transaction processing: Institutions that outsource services like payment processing or investment management should prioritize obtaining a SOC 1 report. This assures that internal controls are in place to safeguard financial reporting and prevent material misstatements, providing confidence to auditors and stakeholders that controls are operating effectively.

SOC 2

SOC 2 is essential when services involve managing data, ensuring system reliability, and maintaining security. Examples include:

• Cloud service providers: These organizations host sensitive customer data and benefit from SOC 2 reports, which validate their controls over security, availability, and confidentiality. SOC 2 compliance builds customer trust, meets regulatory expectations, and demonstrates a strong commitment to protecting data from breaches, downtime, and unauthorized access, helping maintain competitiveness in the cloud services industry.
• SaaS companies: These firms manage sensitive application data, making SOC 2 reports crucial for showing robust controls over security, confidentiality, and privacy. By demonstrating their adherence to industry standards and regulatory requirements, SaaS providers reassure customers that their data is protected, thereby enhancing their credibility in the marketplace.
• Managed IT service providers and data centers: Organizations providing infrastructure and cybersecurity services need SOC 2 reports to validate their controls over security, availability, and confidentiality. These reports assure clients that their data and systems are protected against threats and downtime, ultimately building trust and proving a commitment to secure, reliable, and compliant services.

» Understand the disasters you can avoid by tackling cybersecurity on time

2 Scenarios Where Both SOC 1 and SOC 2 Reports Are Necessary

1. SaaS providers with financial impact: If your SaaS platform handles accounting, billing, or financial reporting, both SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports may be necessary. SOC 1 verifies that your internal controls support accurate financial reporting, while SOC 2 demonstrates how you manage system security and operational reliability. Together, they assure clients that financial data is processed accurately and securely.
2. Healthcare technology providers: Companies offering electronic health records (EHR) or billing systems require SOC 1 to demonstrate controls over financial transactions, while SOC 2 ensures compliance with healthcare privacy regulations like HIPAA. Both reports build trust with healthcare clients, assuring them that financial and patient data are secure and properly managed.

» Make sure you understand how SOC 2 Type 2 strengthens your security posture

Considerations for Maintaining Ongoing Compliance

SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance both require ongoing efforts to ensure internal controls and security measures remain effective. Below are key considerations for maintaining compliance with both SOC 1 and SOC 2.

• Changes in control environment: Significant changes, such as mergers, acquisitions, or new technology implementations, may require more frequent SOC reports, typically every 6 to 12 months. These updates ensure that internal controls remain effective as the control environment evolves.
• Security controls: Regularly assessing and updating security controls is essential to protect customer data. If persistent security challenges are identified, bi-annual SOC 2 Type II audits may be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of controls, address vulnerabilities, and ensure continuous compliance with security standards.
• Regulatory requirements: In industries like healthcare, regulations such as HIPAA require regular risk assessments and secure handling of protected health information (PHI). While HIPAA doesn't mandate specific SOC reporting frequencies, annual or bi-annual SOC reports are commonly used to demonstrate ongoing compliance with privacy and security standards.

» Here's how to create a secure development lifecycle

How GRSee Consulting Guides Your SOC 1 vs. SOC 2 Decision

At GRSee Consulting, we help you confidently choose between SOC 1 and SOC 2 by understanding your business model, industry expectations, and client requirements. We support the entire preparation process, from conducting gap analyses and risk assessments to penetration tests and developing tailored implementation plans. We also provide practical documentation and process guidance so you can approach the SOC examination with clarity and fewer delays.

Throughout the engagement, we manage the audit procedures and coordinate the process to reduce the time, resources, and effort required, while an independent CPA conducts the examination and issues the final SOC report. This approach makes your path to SOC compliance smoother, more efficient, and far less stressful.



» Ready to achieve SOC 2 compliance and build trust with your clients? Get in touch with us to get started